Meghan Markle was spotted looking gleeful while holding son Archie on Wednesday after Prince Harry returned home to California from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/naked cam Prince Philip’s funeral in London. The pregnant Duchess of Sussex, 39, was seen propping the 1-year-old up on her growing baby bump as she carried his space-themed lunch box with her other arm. Markle was dressed casually in blue jeans, a black T-shirt, an army green utility jacket, pointed-toe nude flats and a black face mask. Meghan Markle balanced Archie on her growing baby bump. BACKGRID Meanwhile, Archie donned a black beanie, a gray sweatshirt, rolled jeans, white Velcro sneakers and a green backpack. The former “Suits” star’s outing with her little one came a day after Harry, 36, was seen returning to Los Angeles following his grandfather Philip’s funeral across the pond on Saturday. As Page Six reported, Harry flew into LA on an American Airlines flight that arrived Tuesday afternoon before being driven to his home in Montecito, California. Meghan Markle was dressed casually in jeans and a black T-shirt. BACKGRID He did not stay in town to celebrate Queen Elizabeth II’s 95th birthday, which was on Wednesday. Markle did not attend Philip’s service due to doctor’s orders. However, she and Harry did mourn the late royal with a joint statement on social media after his death on April 9. “Thank you for your service … You will be greatly missed,” the couple wrote on the website for their nonprofit, Archewell Foundation. Prince Harry at Prince Philip’s funeral with Prince William and Peter Phillips on April 17. Getty Images Harry and Meghan, who moved to California after resigning from the royal family, are not on the best terms with Buckingham Palace following their tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey in February. During the bombshell sit-down, Markle opened up about having suicidal thoughts during her first pregnancy and claimed that members of the royal family had voiced “concerns” over Archie’s skin color. The couple announced on Valentine’s Day that they are expecting their second child, a baby girl.
0 Comments
If you think you’ve seen enough of Chris Cuomo after his much-publicized contraction of coronavirus and nightly TV reminders of “you know who my brother is,” think again. The CNN anchor was apparently caught in the nude in the garden of his Hamptons mansion during a social media yoga session filmed by his wife, Cristina Greeven Cuomo. The younger brother of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is seemingly seen in a screengrab strutting his stuff in the buff outside his home in Southampton, where he had been broadcasting from his basement while under quarantine. The 49-year-old super-fit newsman was allegedly seen au naturel outside, captured from behind through the large windows of their home, during an Instagram Live yoga video shot by Cristina. The video was deleted quickly after it was filmed around May 27, but not before some eagle-eyed followers grabbed a stark-naked screenshot. While Page Six has been working to get to the bottom of this birthday-suit broadcast, reps for the host of “Cuomo Prime Time” at CNN and his wife didn’t respond to multiple calls and emails to confirm it is the news anchor’s distinguished derriere. Yet Cuomo, a dad of three, hasn’t otherwise been shy about public exposure. He announced on March 31 that he had tested positive for coronavirus, and gave searing daily accounts on his prime-time program of his painful battle to overcome it. From your job to home and sex life, technology will drastically change the way we live in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?search=naked cam next decade. This week, some of the world’s top engineers and policymakers gathered at the Web Summit in Lisbon to talk about what this brave new world might look like. Here are some of their visions for 2030 and beyond. Porn is set to become a fully immersive experience with today’s virtual reality (VR) augmented by romantic storylines and a more sensory experience. BaDoink VR director and producer Dinorah Hernandez said the company was already filming 15 to 20 scenes per week in the medium that allowed viewers to be the “hero of the scene” with 180-degree views. She said current demands are for “more intimacy” rather than traditional male-dominated encounters, as well as education/entertainment classes for people to become better lovers. “People are asking for more romance, closeness, more talking. This is something you’ll find in a real relationship but not everyone in the world will have access to that kind of relationship,” she said. “To be able to have an experience with another woman could give them something that maybe the real world can’t.” While companies are already competing to provide the best resolution, frame rate and “biosize,” Hernandez said: “We’re going to reach the limit with sight.” “It can only get so good. We might start seeing more integration of touch, smell. We’re going to start to see that.” It’s something De Montfort University’s Kathleen Richardson regards as a “terrible” vision where people’s perceptions could become distorted. She fears continuing down the current path will leave people in a “society of disconnection … and a world primarily organized around rape, abuse and masturbation.” “If there is any sex going on in a filmed porn scenario it’s not something a person outside that can have,” Richardson said. “It’s a non-transferable product. You can’t alienate sex from a human being and sell it to someone else as a commercial product.” Your job probably won’t disappear Randstad’s CEO, Jacques Van den Broek, said despite most jobs being altered by technology, the majority won’t be scrapped — unless you happen to be one of two unlucky types. “The job of a driver will disappear,” he said, given the rise of self-driving cars which are already being rolled out around the world. “If you’re a driver today, you need to find out what you’re good at. “We will take you in 5 to 10 years to be a maintenance engineer. If you wait for it you will become unemployed.” “The job that is definitely going to disappear is autocratic managers because tech will give all the people at the base of the organization all they need to do their jobs well.” Instead, the service sector is set to expand as well as the freelance economy outside the major cities. Van den Broek said most people should “positively embrace” the technology that would become part of their lives but rest assured, the human brain is infinitely more complex and capable than any computer code. “What you really need to do is nurture your soft skills,” he said. “The vast majority of people will get more attractive jobs.” Sleeping with the fishes Kernel founder Bryan Johnson predicts within 15 to 20 years humans will have the ability to hack their own brains and unlock superpowers like incredible memories, computing abilities and transmit brain-to-brain thoughts. He’s developing chips that can be inserted to map neural pathways and expects these tools will be “robust” enough for humans to achieve any scenario they can think of in their feeble, unmodified heads. “For example, could I have a perfect memory? Could I delete my memories? Could I increase my rate of learning? Could I have brain to brain communication?” Johnson said. “Imagine a scenario where I say: ‘I want to know what it’s like to be a cowboy in the American West in the 1800s,’ and someone creates that experience mentally. I’m able to take that and purchase that from that person and experience that.” Blue Abyss operations director Simon Evetts, who is working to unlock the secrets of the world’s oceans and study the effect of extreme environments on the human body, said there may even be a “Homo Oceanis” that lived underwater if we can work out how to transplant genes from other species. “Can we somehow work out how dolphins and seals hold their breath for so long and maybe ourselves do that?” Evetts said. “Are we going to try and internalize those things and end up with large thoracic cavities because we’ve got internal gill sets?” Blue Abyss CEO John Vickers said while humans might be “edited,” they won’t be replaced. “What I want to see in 2030 is that we haven’t lost out to [the] rise of machines. If we completely rely on tech and we develop stuff to abdicate ourselves, we lose what it means to be human,” he said. Soylent for dinner Silicon Valley Robotics managing director Andra Keay said the lifestyle for poor and rich people could be vastly different in 2030 depending on the technology available to them. Describing a hypothetical scenario where one wakes to sunrise and birdsong from a curated soundtrack, she said voice assistants could be embedded in the walls to describe your day ahead. “I’m very proud of the fact my house is energy neutral. We still have our own car which my daughter will shuttle to school in the safest way,” Keay said, adding that she might work in a collective union that provided better health and benefits than being part of the gig economy. However, if you’re poor “that’s not what it looks like,” she continued, describing a world where a family could live on a universal basic income and have to submit feedback survey forms constantly to tech companies as part of an eternal quest for data. “Everyone can afford (nutrient food substitute) soylent but if I’ve got cash we can splash on junk food,” she said about a dystopian future. “I do permissions for DNA because I can get paid if my DNA is used in commercial products.” Meanwhile, commutes will be done via Uber’s new fleet of custom-designed aircraft that can chew up the “gnarliest” journey in minutes. Chief product officer Jeff Holden announced the company would launch a fleet in Los Angeles by 2020 while overhauling airspace management with NASA. “Just as skyscrapers were the solution to commercial and residential density in cities, we believe that moving local transportation to the sky is going to open up incredible mobility bandwidth in cities,” he said. The latest video of a traffic stop http://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=naked cam gone horribly wrong has eerie parallels to an episode from 75 years ago In the midst of the trial of former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin in the death of George Floyd, more Americans are becoming familiar with the ways Black men continue to be mistreated by law enforcement. Last week yet another disturbing encounter between a Black man and the police came to light — and this time the incident has eerie echoes not only of the recent past but also of an incident three-quarters of a century ago. In a lawsuit filed against two police officers in Windsor, Virginia, Army 2nd Lt. Caron Nazario says that he was on his way home from purchasing a new S.U.V. last December when he saw police cruiser lights behind him. He was on a dark road, so he slowed down, turned on his hazard lights and drove to a well-lit gas station. Body-cam video shows what happened next: Officers screaming at the fatigues-clad Nazario, giving contradictory orders, suggesting he was facing imminent execution (“You’re fixin’ to ride the lightning”), pepper-spraying him, beating his legs with a night stick and forcing him to the ground before eventually handcuffing him. Throughout, Nazario’s resistance consists mainly of asking repeatedly what is going on. The purported reason for the stop was driving without a visible rear license plate. But his new vehicle’s temporary tags were in the rear window — and are plainly visible in the light of the gas station. The footage will have every Black American nodding knowingly at each discrete decision Nazario makes. In a sense, Nazario is lucky that he’s alive to sue — unlike, say, Philando Castile, who was shot in 2016 in suburban Minneapolis after announcing during a traffic stop that he had a legal gun in the car. Despite being pepper-sprayed, Nazario gets to see another day. And yet, the historical parallel for the Nazario incident isn’t necessarily in the various encounters of the last decade that fueled the rise of Black Lives Matter. No, for this earlier verse, one need go back to 1946, and a World War II veteran who walked away, even if he literally never saw another day. Last month, PBS’s “American Experience” aired “The Blinding of Isaac Woodard.” In a nation whose understanding of civil rights heroes and martyrs seems confined to Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks and Emmett Till, Woodard’s story is a reminder for some and an introduction for many more of the deep savagery of American racism. In 1946, Woodard was returning from having served three years in Europe. The final leg of his trip was a bus ride to his home in Batesburg, S.C. Woodard asked the bus driver to stop so he could use a bathroom. The driver cursed him in racially offensive language. Woodard cursed back. Shortly thereafter, the driver stopped the bus and Batesburg Police Chief Lynwood Shull pulled Woodard off. He struck him repeatedly with his baton — then used it to gouge out Woodard’s eyes. Woodard would awaken in a jail cell, permanently blind. He would not gain personal justice. The all-White jury acquitted in half an hour. It only took that long because the presiding judge took a lengthy lunch break, to prevent the jury from returning a five-minute verdict. Nonetheless, Woodard’s brutal treatment was a galvanizing moment in the civil rights movement: The NAACP seized on it to demonstrate the horrific racist violence returning Black veterans faced in the South. Orson Welles publicized the incident, and celebrities raised money on Woodard’s behalf. Most significantly, a horrified President Harry Truman was inspired to desegregate the military (and, indeed, all federal offices). And the NAACP’s lawyer, Thurgood Marshall, took up a South Carolina school segregation case that became one of the foundations for his eventual successful argument in Brown vs. Board of Education. Eleven months ago, George Floyd’s death launched a presumed “reckoning on race.” Seven and a half decades after Woodard, will another veteran’s abuse at the hands of police spark another conversation? Remarkably, just after the damning videos came to light, the town of Windsor announced on Sunday that one of the officers who pepper-sprayed Nazario has been fired. That he was dismissed so abruptly may indicate a real change in relations between the police and the public. So does the filing of manslaughter charges against the officer who shot and killed Daunte Wright in suburban Minneapolis. On the other hand, Wright’s death has ignited days of unrest. Maybe, after 75 years, America might just get it right. Or maybe willful blindness is America’s perpetual curse. CHICAGO (CBS) — For the first time, police body camera video reveals what an innocent woman said happened to her nearly two years ago: police officers wrongly entered her home with guns drawn and handcuffed her naked as she watched in horror. READ MORE: Chicago Weather: Best Rain Friday Night Last year, Anjanette Young filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the video to show the public what happened to her that day. CBS 2 also filed a request for the video. But the Chicago Police Department denied the requests. Young recently obtained the footage after a court forced CPD to turn it over as part of her lawsuit against police. “I feel like they didn’t want us to have this video because they knew how bad it was,” Young said. “They knew they had done something wrong. They knew that the way they treated me was not right.” Hours before the TV version of this report broadcast, the city’s lawyers attempted to stop CBS 2 from airing the video by naked teen cam filing an emergency motion in federal court. If you believe police have wrongly entered your home, tell us about it here. The video reveals on Feb. 21, 2019, nine body cameras rolled as a group of male officers entered her home at 7 p.m. Not long before, the licensed social worker finished her shift at the hospital and had undressed in her bedroom. That’s when she said she heard a loud, pounding noise. Outside, officers repeatedly struck her door with a battering ram. From various angles, the video captured the moments they broke down the door and burst through her home. “It was so traumatic to hear the thing that was hitting the door,” Young said, as she watched the video. “And it happened so fast, I didn’t have time to put on clothes.” As they rushed inside with guns drawn, officers yelled, “Police search warrant,” and “Hands up, hands up, hands up.” Seconds later, Young could be seen in the living room, shocked and completely naked, with her hands up. “There were big guns,” Young remembered. “Guns with lights and scopes on them. And they were yelling at me, you know, put your hands up, put your hands up.” Young looked terrified and confused as she watched officers search the home. An officer put her hands behind her back and handcuffed her as she stood naked. “What is going on?” Young yelled in the video. “There’s nobody else here, I live alone. I mean, what is going on here? You’ve got the wrong house. I live alone.” “It’s one of those moments where I felt I could have died that night,” she said. “Like if I would have made one wrong move, it felt like they would have shot me. I truly believe they would have shot me.” And like so many other wrong raids CBS 2 uncovered, the one on Young’s home could have been avoided. Using body camera video and police and court records, CBS 2 pieced together – moment by moment – not only how Young was treated during the raid, but also how police failed to check the bad tip that led them there. Young recently agreed to an interview to discuss the body camera video after she first spoke to CBS 2 last year. CBS 2 blurred portions of the video in which Young was unclothed. With her hands bound behind her back, the video shows an officer wrapped a short coat around her shoulders. But the coat only covered her shoulders and upper back – leaving her front completely exposed as she stood against the wall. Officers stood around her home – in the kitchen, the living room and the hallways – while she remained naked. “It felt like forever to me,” she said. “It felt like forever.” About two minutes after police entered the home, an officer found a blanket and wrapped it around Young as she sobbed and repeatedly asked officers who they were looking for. “They just threw something over me, and my hands are behind me and I’m handcuffed,” Young said in an interview. “So there’s no way for me to secure the blanket around me.” The blanket continued to slide open and expose her body. One video clip shows an officer stood in front of Young but made no attempt to cover her. Another officer walked over and held the blanket closed. Young continued to beg police for answers. “Tell me what’s going on,” she cried in the video. “You’ve got the wrong house, you’ve got the wrong house, you’ve got the wrong house,” Young repeated. “There’s no one else who lives in this apartment?” the sergeant asked. “No, no one else lives here,” Young said. Young told police at least 43 times they were in the wrong home. She repeatedly asked them to allow her to get dressed and told them she believed they had bad information. “Oh my God, this cannot be right,” Young said during the raid. “How is this legal?” Police did have bad information, CBS 2 Investigators uncovered, and they failed to do basic checks to confirm whether they had the correct address before getting the search warrant approved. According to CPD’s complaint for search warrant, one day before the raid, a confidential informant told the affiant – or lead officer on the raid – that he recently saw a 23-year-old man who was a known felon with gun and ammunition. The document said the officer found a photo of the suspect in a police database and showed it to the informant, who confirmed it was him. The officer then drove the informant to the address where the informant claimed the suspect lived. Despite no evidence in the complaint that police made efforts to independently verify the informant’s tip, such as conducting any surveillance or additional checks as required by policy, the search warrant was approved by an assistant state’s attorney and a judge. But CBS 2 quickly found, through police and court records, the informant gave police the wrong address. The 23-year-old suspect police were looking for actually lived in the unit next door to Young at the time of the raid and had no connection to her. CBS 2 also found police could have easily tracked the suspect’s location and where he really lived because at the time of the raid, he was wearing an electronic monitoring device. “That piece of paper [search warrant] gives them the right to, you know, that says you can do X, Y, Z based on what’s on that paper,” Young said. “So if you get it wrong, you are taking 100 percent control of someone else’s life and treating them in a bad way.” The body camera video also raises questions about the approval of the warrant. In one clip, officers in a squad car reviewed their notes and can be heard talking. CPD wouldn’t comment when CBS 2 asked what the conversation meant. “It wasn’t initially approved or some crap,” one officer said. READ MORE: Getting Hosed: A Look At The Universe Of Chicago Water, And Click for more info Its Sometimes-Sordid History, This Earth Day “What does that mean?” the second officer asked. “I have no idea,” the first officer said. “I mean, they told him it was approved, then I guess that person messed up on their end.” Citing an ongoing investigation by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA), CPD also wouldn’t comment when CBS 2 asked about the raid or why officers acted solely on an informant’s tip. But the video shows Young made multiple attempts to ask CPD some of those same questions. “Who are you looking for?” Young asked. “I’ve been living here for four years and nobody lives here but me,” she yelled. “I’m telling you this is wrong,” Young continued. “I have nothing to do with whoever this person is you are looking for.” This is not the first time police failed to do basic checks that would have contradicted bad information given by an informant. Last year, CBS 2 interviewed the Blassingame family who were wrongly raided by police in 2015. Jalonda Blassingame’s young sons said officers pointed guns at them, leaving them traumatized, like dozens of other children CBS 2 interviewed as part of its two-year investigative series. “I felt scared for my life,” said her son Jaden, who was 10 at the time of the raid. CBS 2 quickly found the suspect police were looking for had no connection to the Blassingames and had been in prison at the time of the raid for years. That trauma experienced by innocent children and families as a result of wrong CPD raids was the subject of CBS 2’s half-hour documentary, “[un]warranted.” It also examines how Black and Latino families are disproportionately affected. “They are adding trauma to people’s lives that will be with them the rest of their lives,” Young said. “Children have to grow up with that for the rest of their lives. The system is broken.” Many of the families interviewed, including Young, filed lawsuits against police. Keenan Saulter, Young’s attorney, said he believes wrong raids are violating families’ constitutional rights. “If this had been a young woman in Lincoln Park by herself in her home naked, a young white woman — let’s just be frank – if the reaction would have been the same? I don’t think it would have been,” Saulter said. “I think [officers] would have saw that woman, rightfully so, as someone who was vulnerable, someone who deserved protection, someone who deserved to have their dignity maintained. They viewed Ms. Young as less than human.” Young said the way officers treated and spoke to her during the raid amplified the trauma she experienced. The video shows she was visibly upset and afraid as she asked police questions, but did not immediately receive any answers about why officers were there. “OK, OK, you don’t have to shout,” the sergeant said. “I don’t have to shout?” Young yelled. “This is f****** ridiculous. You’ve got me in handcuffs. I’m naked, and you kicked my house in. I keep telling you, you’ve got the wrong place.” Young cried during her interview when she remembered how police treated her. “When I asked them to show me, when I asked them to tell me what they are doing in my house, and their response to me was just, shut up and calm down, that’s so disrespectful,” she said. About 13 minutes into the raid, a female officer who later arrived walked Young to her room so she could get dressed, but put the handcuffs back on afterward. Police https://allizon.com/blog/ continued to question Young while she was clothed. “Ma’am, there’s no firearms in this place?” the sergeant asked. “There’s no gun in this place…no, no, no,” Young answered. “I am a social worker…I’ve been a social worker for 20 years. I follow the law. I don’t get in trouble for anything. I don’t do illegal stuff. I’m not that person. You’ve got the wrong information.” The sergeant then told the affiant officer – the cop who got the warrant – to step outside. “I want to have a conversation with you, let’s go talk outside,” the sergeant said. But moments later, the officer’s body camera turned off. CPD did not respond to questions about why the camera was turned off – a pattern CBS 2 found both during wrong raids and in CPD’s every day interactions with civilians. After nearly 20 minutes, police finally removed the handcuffs. Toward the end of the raid, the sergeant apologized to Young, the video shows. “I do apologize for bothering you tonight,” the sergeant said. “I assure you that the city will be in contact with you tomorrow.” “Is there anything I can do right now?” the sergeant also asked. “Just leave and let me move on, this is so crazy,” Young said, still in tears. “Again, I do apologize for meeting you this way,” the sergeant said. “I will do everything I can do to get the door fixed.” Officers then attempted to fix her door with a hammer. When that didn’t work, they tried to wedge an ironing board in between the door. Young said it was “surreal” watching the body camera video of what happened to her nearly two years later. “It’s almost like a bad movie,” she said. “I feel like I’m watching a movie, but those are no actors, I’m no actor, but this is my life and it happened to me.” In response to the city’s emergency motion and efforts to stop CBS 2 from airing the body camera video, CBS 2’s attorneys filed a response in federal court Monday night. They said the city’s action is unconstitutional and an attempt to suppress CBS 2’s reporting. While the report was being broadcast, a judge denied the city’s motion. Even though the incident happened in February of 2019, COPA did not open the investigation or contact Young until nine months later when CBS 2 first broke the story online. On Nov. 25, 2020 – more than a year since COPA began investigating – COPA said it “is still in the process of serving allegations and conducting all necessary officer interviews.” While Young continues to live with trauma – that feeling of safety at home, she said, is lost – she leans on her church for healing and support. She believes she has a responsibility to use her voice to help protect others. And if police don’t make sure they have the correct address before conducting search warrants, she said, their actions will continue to traumatize innocent families. “The work is warranted – they need to do the work,” Young said. “But they need to do it right. They can’t just callously do it and leave people’s lives in ruins because they got it wrong.” |